devwithjev
— reading now— views
Submit a build

All builds

1857 builds · page 45 of 47

Mario Jankovic@mariojankovic𝕏
Video playing at 1x. Pulled transcripts for ~400 YouTube videos into my app, then let Jev loose on all of them to find which are worth building my next video on. 11 seconds, $0.004. 291 ruled out, 82 worth a look so we ranked those. https://t.co/Sp8MYr2uno
1871X posts·Content & growthcost$0.004time11 secondsOriginal source ↗
JollyRojak@Michael50663932𝕏
I built a chaotic kitchen to stress-test Jev. 4 chefs. Expiring orders. Competing priorities. The occasional fire. In an early live test, Jev gave firefighting a 66% probability over finishing the order at 33%, then returned its move in ~200ms warm. V1 is live. Try to break it: https://t.co/ZSDZhXK3KZ
1868X posts·Games & real timetime~200ms warmOriginal source ↗
Aaron Levie@levie𝕏
Jev will be super helpful for agents to make split second decisions in workflows, data classification, judgment calls, and hundreds of other use-cases in the enterprise. Here's a quick demo with Box and Jev to make that real. The demo pulls an incident report from Box, asks whether it's customer-facing and how severe it is, moves the file into escalate, monitor, or review folders, and sets a metad
1867X posts·Triage & routingOriginal source ↗
Albiona Hoti@albicodes𝕏
went deeper down the Jev rabbit hole 🌻 196 artworks from The Met mapped between quiet ↔ loud and sacred ↔ domestic change the words and watch the collection rearrange https://t.co/deUdeapWKu
1866X posts·Tools & appsOriginal source ↗
梭哈.AI@SUOHA_AI𝕏
完全睡不着了....这个视频让你完全看懂JEV的恐怖能力 我实际演示了一下,用 JEV 和 DeepSeek 做同一个任务:从当天的海量实时新闻流里,为 15 个品牌快速匹配有没有适合借势的公关热点,并打上结构化意图分类标签 结果是:28 秒内,Jev 狂刷完了整整 428 条数据,并完成了全部的目标分解与分类;而同一时间跑在同样任务上的 DeepSeek V4.1-flash,才刚刚完成 6/428 条 速度被拉开了几十倍,答案甚至在你读完第一行字之前就已经返回了.... 为什么会产生这么恐怖的差距?底层逻辑是: • DeepSeek 这种通用模型本质上是在“逐字写文章”: 哪怕你只让它做个最简单的“是/否”判断,它在后台也必须一个词一个词往外推,硬走一遍漫长的生成流程,延迟按秒起步 • Jev 官方定位是“System 1(快决策)”模型,从根上就根本不会写字: 它彻底抛弃了逐字吐词,
1865X posts·Content & growthtime28 秒内Original source ↗
JUUN@junhoh0ng𝕏
Can Jev escape a maze? Turns out it depends how you write the map. When given as a 2D grid, “wall above?” is worse than chance. “Wall to the right?” is 99.9%. Rotate the page and every side becomes 1.00. It isn’t seeing the grid. It’s reading the next character. So I gave @typesafeai’s Jev the maze as lines of sight and named places, not as a map. Notes below.
1864X posts·Tools & appsOriginal source ↗
あるごす@argos_M1111𝕏
ローカルJevできた。確信度ないけどw 40msで返事返ってくると不安になるけど一応GPUはピクっと動いているのでLLMの出力にはなっている https://t.co/8eEtZ0CpSU
1862X posts·Tools & appstime40msOriginal source ↗
Zach A@rherton𝕏
the obligatory AI plays Mario, Jev version Jev is TypeSafe's System One model. u send it state and a typed question, it sends back a choice with probabilities. so every move here is one question: run, hop, jump, wait or go back it reads the game from NES memory, no pixels. 193 calls to clear 1-1, abt 300ms each right side is the real request and answer for every decision. the game is paused while
1861X posts·Games & real timetimeabt 300ms eachOriginal source ↗
Hassan@nutlope𝕏
Jev vs GLM 5.3 at chess! Results: ◾ GLM 5.3 won by checkmate in 29 moves ◾ Jev: ~0.3s and <$0.0001 per move ◾ GLM 5.3: ~5.8s and ~$0.008 per move ◾ The whole game cost 24 cents My main takeaway is that it's often useful to use each one to their strengths: ◾ Fast, well-defined classification → specialized models like Jev ◾ Classifications that need reasoning or lookahead → LLMs like GLM 5.3 ◾ Real
1860X posts·Games & real timecostJev: <$0.0001 per move; GLM 5.3: ~$0.008 per move; The whole game cost 24 centstimeJev: ~0.3s per move; GLM 5.3: ~5.8s per moveOriginal source ↗
Husain@husain_j53𝕏
Tried Jev for this use case : On one side: a JD → extract the most important requirements. On the other: upload multiple resumes → see which candidate fits the JD best. Jev was surprisingly fast at this. I will test this model on a few other use cases I have in mind. https://t.co/b0IkQ3zDjM
1859X posts·Triage & routingOriginal source ↗
Matt Mastracci@mmastrac𝕏
DiffusionGemma-as-Jev (aka djev) running near-real-time vision detection from a mobile phone using its native vision tower. Please don't fall down the stairs! https://t.co/C9kBCD6irx
1856X posts·Robotics & devicesOriginal source ↗
Adi@aditya005𝕏
I built a game were you play against a sentinel in two modes: 1. Default: Sentinel runs a fixed chain of if/else rules. It follows every one of them and still wanders the map looking for me. 2. JEV Live: hands the Sentinel's tactical call to JEV. -> It went and covered the exit. 💀 Same game, same available moves. Only the decision logic changed.
1855X posts·Games & real timeOriginal source ↗
gokaygokay@gokayfem𝕏
Jev x GPT-6 Astra x H3 Max I created a complex decision making game with Astra. It is about keeping the city on a whale alive with decisions. - GPT 6 Astra designed the world - Jev chose the actions - H3 Max Turbo on fal turned one decision from each round into video All of the Jev decision making and video generations took only 5 minutes for 264 clips
1853X posts·Games & real timetimeonly 5 minutes for 264 clipsOriginal source ↗
Dmytro Hrybov@dimentary𝕏
tested Jev as a real-time robotics policy in MuJoCo it struggled at first, so i split each update into two calls: decide what to do next, then decide how to move the arm and gripper Jev doesn’t accept images, it gets simplified geometry and contacts as text here https://t.co/iKK7jcrrpO
1851X posts·Robotics & devicesOriginal source ↗
hityyhz@hityyhz𝕏
Also been playing with @typesafeai Jev. Insane. A pile of apps suddenly become possible. What a time to be a builder. Sharing experiments here. First one: Keystroke oracle / predictive launcher A normal launcher ranks by aliases, fuzzy match, and habit. Jev reads intent. Type “the pdf I just downloaded” and the newest PDF is already the top hit. Full confidence on every keystroke. About 100 ms.
1850X posts·Tools & appstimeAbout 100 msOriginal source ↗
Higgsfield AI 🧩@higgsfield_ai𝕏
Jev + Higgsfield = solved auto-routing for genAI models. In this demo, @typesafeai’s Jev evaluates prompt and picks the most fit models for video and image generations on Higgsfield API. https://t.co/MyTRdqlZ3o
1848X posts·Triage & routingOriginal source ↗
Tanay Soni@tanaysoni_𝕏
Jev + OpenCode + Browser Harness + Sanbox = 🔥 Watch how OpenCode + browser harness visit a tetris game website, read the control instructions, use gpt-6 to build a game controller for Jev model, and then hand off to play the game. This is all a single shot prompt with no special skills or tools. Jev model chooses from predefined outputs. In this setup keyboard based gameplay actions were not inclu
1843X posts·Agents & browsersOriginal source ↗
Payam@im_payam𝕏
I used Jev to build the fastest SEO/AEO audit tool it took it 16 seconds to audit my full website It goes through every page on your website, analyse it checks it's html code, content and gives a full prompt to fix them too. It's free and available on Bottally now. https://t.co/oYTFCWYjUY
1842X posts·Content & growthtime16 secondsOriginal source ↗
Alex Carrabre@carrabre𝕏
Jev added more precise camera controls and ~230x faster planning to an editing tool I built on top of @mintdotgg! Jev converts natural language to precise camera movements (ie spelling ASTRA) by answering a few calibrated multiple-choice questions (move kind, plus direction and magnitude band per camera axis) By creating keyframes it emits a structured trajectory (time/azimuth/elevation/distance)
1841X posts·Tools & appstime~230x faster planningOriginal source ↗
Grover@GroverInnovate𝕏
I used Jev to give a tiny civilization six minds. Then I played GOD. Kindness earned trust, Tyranny sparked rebellion and an apology didn’t convince everyone. Jev decides how each faction reacts and the simulation brings it to life. Try GODMODE in replies ⬇️ @typesafeai #jev https://t.co/qRiNOIylwa
1837X posts·Games & real timeOriginal source ↗
Sasha@sashatwitts𝕏
made some time to test jev from @typesafeai used theMealDB and sent each recipe to Jev to score on five dimensions: quick, cheap, healthy, impressive, and beginner-friendly, while filtering out desserts, sauces, bread, etc. The whole run took just over a minute and cost $0.0455. I ran it twice and got slightly different rankings. Close results swapped places over the runs. So you either need to us
1835X posts·Tools & appscost$0.0455timejust over a minuteOriginal source ↗
Kevin Kern@kevinkern𝕏
Was curious how jev performs for e2e testing on a real android device. Both started with the same prompt and 15 test steps. Well, jev was ~14.8x faster than deepseek + vision navigating through wikipedia. https://t.co/xLW13tBISH
1834X posts·Agents & browserstime~14.8x fasterOriginal source ↗
Deniz Sancar@densancar𝕏
jev is bloody INSANE we gave it a library of over 11 million videos on t1ktok & 1nstagram and asked it to find viral "bloom nutrition" content. in 20 seconds, it gave us over 384 videos, breaking down the hook, format & angle that made each one go viral. (and it only costed $0.09 in token usage) jev finds, watches, analyzes and breaks down viral videos and creators, then writes briefs and scripts
1833X posts·Content & growthcost$0.09 in token usagetimein 20 secondsOriginal source ↗
Nick ✪@nickfthedev𝕏
Now it's my turn. Jev sorts my inbox very quickly and accurate and also let's me add custom filters? I was working on my own mail client for private use for mac and linux and today i wired it up to use jev to sort my mailbox as i need it. Also in there are AI replies (not jev, use any model you like gemini is good for this) and all works with an Openrouter API Key Who wants to try it?
1831X posts·Tools & appsOriginal source ↗
Daninal Hung@ItsDanielHung𝕏
I built a real-time filter for X with Jev as you scroll, it spots engagement bait, rage bait, and promo posts, then throws them into a trash bin. and it's open source so you could BYOK ⬇️ https://t.co/UyAjHiuwP1
1830X posts·Tools & appsOriginal source ↗
Nico More@nicolasmore_𝕏
JEV is INSANE 🔥 we gave it 1,873 backlink outreach emails to see which ones are more probably to get a reply (0-100) for each one it analyzed: → website and article relevance → how natural the proposed placement felt → contact message fit → personalization quality → friction of the request we then ranked the entire campaign and prioritized the emails with the highest probability of success this is
1829X posts·Content & growthOriginal source ↗
The Startup Ideas Podcast (SIP) 🧃@startupideaspod𝕏
What does it cost to sort 1,700 emails with Jev? I gave JEV each full email object: - Subject - body - sender No special changes. Jev sent back 4 values for each email: - Category: work, shopping, finance, security - Priority: low to urgent - Spam score: a percentage - Reply score: how much the email needs a reply from me One user wrote that their account had a violation. JEV gave it a 90% reply s
1828X posts·Triage & routingOriginal source ↗