devwithjev
reading now views
Submit a build

All builds

386 builds · page 6 of 10

featherless-ai@featherless-ai
Open-model Jev-style server that reads next-token logits to return typed choices, rubric scores, and truth judgments.
0208GitHub·Tools & appsOriginal source ↗
DevMortimer@DevMortimer
Pi extension with a batched Jev evaluation tool, terminal playground, and typed API for other extensions.
0144GitHub·Tools & appsOriginal source ↗
mizchi@mizchi
Text linter that uses Jev Score judgments to evaluate strings embedded in source code against configurable writing rules.
0417GitHub·Tools & appsOriginal source ↗
nidhi-singh02@nidhi-singh02
CLI that uses Jev task classification to choose and launch Cursor, Claude Code, Codex, or OpenCode with an appropriate model and effort level.
0416GitHub·Triage & routingOriginal source ↗
tamaratran@tamaratran
Claude Code and Codex hooks that ask Jev which parts of long shell output remain relevant before sending them into model context.
0379GitHub·Tools & appsOriginal source ↗
tacticocc@tacticocc
ACP and MCP adapter that exposes Jev typed decisions and computer-use actions to Codex, Claude, OpenCode, and other agents.
0310GitHub·Agents & browsersOriginal source ↗
ekzhang@ekzhang
Jev-compatible API server built on open models and SGLang, with prefill-only inference and typed decision endpoints.
0210GitHub·Tools & appsOriginal source ↗
jaredpalmer@jaredpalmer
Trainable family of small Qwen-based Jev-like decision models with typed primitives, datasets, evaluation tools, and local inference.
0207GitHub·Tools & appsOriginal source ↗
HasanagaHasanaga@hmammadov𝕏
Fast natural-language search for Azerbaijani names, built with Jev. 💬 "a Turkish girl's name, flower-related, not too popular" → ranked results in half a second 11,000 names, 93 semantic traits. Unlike an LLM, Jev doesn't write answers - it makes decisions. ~0.5s. $0.00025 a query. #jev #typesafe https://t.co/DaHVDrdeQ1
0263X posts·Tools & appscost$0.00025 a querytime~0.5sOriginal source ↗
venusvenus@RitOnchain𝕏
i genuinely don't understand why anyone is using combo of "Jev + Polymarket" as trading router. i just built jev layer with agenkit in my trading system that gave me edge to create alpha. i am openly leaking the cheatsheet. Bookmark before it's too late and start using Jev in your trading system.
0247X posts·Trading & marketsOriginal source ↗
Ch3ngassCh3ngass@lu_chengass𝕏
Been experimenting with using jev as an attention layer over code retrieval. On 356 held-out SWE-Explore tasks, adding Jev reranking to the same 100 zvec candidates improved core recall@1k lines from 11.96% → 22.95%. More here: https://t.co/ZNp3AnD8Bn #jev #TypeScript
0246X posts·Tools & appsOriginal source ↗
Seth CroninSeth Cronin@SethCronin𝕏
Jev the Band: I made a jam band using jev. (🎧on) I taught jev how to read and write music Guitar, Bass, Drums, and Keys controlled by jev lights controlled by Jev soundboard, yup, it's Jev I've been obsessed with recording Jev's jams this weekend and now I'm sharing them with you
0245X posts·Robotics & devicesOriginal source ↗
0xMarioNawfal0xMarioNawfal@RoundtableSpace𝕏
A fully autonomous real-time trading bot built with Jev in one evening and morning, ingesting onchain and offchain data for rapid decisions, has lost $31,680 so far. https://t.co/lYAShIq9cg
0244X posts·Trading & marketsOriginal source ↗
CyrilXBTCyrilXBT@cyrilXBT𝕏
A tiny open source browser agent using Jev instead of an LLM for every click. Found a flight search in 7 SECONDS. Total cost: $0.0039. Here's why that's not a typo. A normal browser agent asks a chat model "what should I click" on every single step. That's a full generation call, just to pick a button. Mine doesn't. The DOM state at each step becomes the input. Jev gets the available actions as a typed choice question. It picks the action, not by generating text, by classifying against what's actually on the page. The only place a language model still runs is typing free text into a fie
0243X posts·Agents & browserscost$0.0039time7 SECONDSOriginal source ↗
nassim-arifette@nassim-arifette
Semantic code search CLI and MCP server: Jev scores authorized repository excerpts and returns exact file paths and line numbers to coding agents.
0427GitHub·Tools & appsOriginal source ↗
Devin-AXIS@Devin-AXIS
Decision plugin for DeepSeek Harness and iPolloWork that lets OpenCode, Codex, and other agents use Jev to select tools, skills, and task owners and evaluate outputs.
0418GitHub·Agents & browsersOriginal source ↗
Ray-Hughes@Ray-Hughes
Rails-native Jev wrapper that turns typed, calibrated decisions into application control flow.
0340GitHub·Tools & appsOriginal source ↗
abhishek085@abhishek085
Open local System One implementation for NVIDIA DGX Spark, with a Qwen3-based model, Jev-compatible API, architecture notes, and evaluation tooling.
0251GitHub·Tools & appsOriginal source ↗
kisshan13@kisshan13
Community Go client for the TypeSafe System One API with typed question builders, retries, examples, and jev-latest as the default model.
0176GitHub·Tools & appsOriginal source ↗
Johnk3rJohnk3r@johnk3r𝕏
Anyone else playing with JEV? Feels like that’s all I’m seeing today 😅 I built a small PoC using JEV as a pre-screening step for reverse engineering, before sending the APKs to an LLM for deeper analysis. The flow is pretty simple: `APK → static analysis + Quark → JEV → score → reverse or skip` The goal is to avoid burning LLM tokens on samples that don’t really warrant deeper reversing. It’s still early, but the token savings are already pretty interesting when you’re triaging a bunch of samples. #Reversing #LLM #JEV #Malware
0242X posts·Triage & routingOriginal source ↗
JH TraderJH Trader@JoshExile82𝕏
Okay so we also built something else. So we are using @Muse & @typesafeai Jev together now. I’m using Jev to grade my AI assistant Sarah on her own work before I ever see it. So (Jev by Typesafe) will act as the judge. Every caption draft gets scored against my actual writing voice: my hooks, my outro style, my banned words, all of it. And It's bigger than captions. Before she states a fact, the judge checks it against her own records, it caught a wrong number tonight before I saw it. Before she acts on a vague instruction, the judge decides: act, or ask me first. A checklist that never
0241X posts·Content & growthOriginal source ↗
codilacodila@0xCodila𝕏
I found the "Internet" moment in using Jev Jev analyzed every LLM and chose the BEST-VALUE one for each prompt It cut my costs and time by ~80% - and it’s probably the best way to use Jev... here's how to setup it in 10 min: step 1 → open @typesafeai , create API key (keep it off chat paste) step 2 → store TYPESAFE_API_KEY in a local .env step 3 → clone the Github below, then npm install && npm test && npm run demo step 4 → test Jev before connecting an agent: npx tsx sdk-runner/cli.ts --route-only "Rename a button label" step 5 → dry-run first: npx tsx sdk-runner/cli.ts --dry-run "you
0239X posts·Guides & tutorialscost~80%time~80%Original source ↗
Pablo MolinaPablo Molina@26pablo7𝕏
i've built an extension for twitter that ranks every tweet by relevance based on your interests using @typesafeai 's Jev, highlights very recent tweets to maximize engagement and assesses your tweets based on your goal (also using Jev) should I open source it? https://t.co/GgQjTT2NWy
0238X posts·Tools & appsOriginal source ↗
Dorian SmileyDorian Smiley@dsmiley411𝕏
I wanted to post a preview of our Jev benchmark dropping tomorrow. We are using Jev to generate symbolic programs (state machines) through an iterative process. The results so far have been amazing! The old process took ~2–10 seconds. With Jev, it’s ~0.3–2 seconds. The costs have also dropped by an order of magnitude. Jev is also used in control flow, removing the need for brittle heuristics.
0237X posts·Tools & appscostdropped by an order of magnitudetime~0.3–2 secondsOriginal source ↗
PraashPraash@10Xpraash𝕏
I built a token compression engine using Jev. It evaluates document (huge text) chunks in parallel, in sub-100ms passes, stripping 85% of boilerplate so we only pay Claude or GPT-4 for high-signal answers. Here is a demo https://t.co/3nVjtG8zZY
0236X posts·Tools & appstimesub-100ms passesOriginal source ↗
VarunVarun@varun_mathur𝕏
noticed below cumulative impact of using Jev + Jevcache + Fable: - Per-decision: ~220–780ms Jev vs 20–40s claude before - Loop's decisions are ~50× cheaper; Fable was consulted only on the 3 low-confidence steps - jevcache: earlier identical-phrasing re-run showed cached (0ms replay) live.. repeat run was 26% faster (7.2→5.3 min)
0235X posts·Agents & browserscost~50× cheapertime~220–780ms Jev vs 20–40s claude before; 0ms replay; 7.2→5.3 minOriginal source ↗
Soups RanjanSoups Ranjan@soupsranjan𝕏
Jev can outperform the rules many companies use to prevent fraud. We found that without any pre-training, it accurately detected 93% of a fraud ring. In contrast, an LLM in a similar set up only achieved 62%. https://t.co/ronCD7hLvb
0200X posts·Triage & routingOriginal source ↗
ElayaElaya@elayadesigns𝕏
3 days. First AI product I've ever built, with Jev doing some of the heavy lifting inside it. Here's the landing page. No Figma at all, just Cursor ai and the design skill I built. Launching soon https://t.co/VBhWBCVEMf
0199X posts·Tools & appsOriginal source ↗
Yatharth VermaYatharth Verma@yatharth170699𝕏
I just classified a month of my Gmail for eight hundredths of a cent. 150 emails → 9 folders. Read-only, nothing written back to my inbox. Built with Jev. Repo below 👇 https://t.co/PaUcxpcDE1
0198X posts·Triage & routingcosteight hundredths of a centOriginal source ↗
Nabendu BiswasNabendu Biswas@nabendu82𝕏
I builded Jev Reflex which can control your mac with hand gestures and voice. It is build with Jev 1.13 from @typesafeai . I builded it with @OpenAI Codex using Astra and Sol. It is using Jev credentials from @OpenRouter and for all this just used $0.01. As you can see in the video, it recognizes hand gestures and voice and can do various task on mack, like mazimize or minimize anything you point you index finger. And then pinch gesture to complete it. It took me 2 hours to build it on a monday morning, which included code, enabling controls on mac and calibrating it first. Project availbl
0197X posts·Robotics & devicescost$0.01Original source ↗
Aarjav shahAarjav shah@aarjavshahhh𝕏
Using JEV by @typesafeai to classify the 100s of inbound deals we get, side-by-side with a small open model we’ve been using for our in-house AI rating module that self-trains. impressive how close JEV gets while being significantly cheaper and faster to run for classification :) https://t.co/6c6I9SHQuY
0196X posts·Triage & routingOriginal source ↗
search foundersearch founder@n0riskn0r3ward𝕏
There's a fun mix of excitement and cope on my timeline re-Jev: - OMG I made Jev a year ago this is dumb - You can fine tune this encoder into a better, faster, local classifier, etc Re the "just train your own small classifier" crew - Voyage trains great, SOTA pointwise rerankers that are obviously specialized to the reranking task and have been at it for years, likely also using a strong synthetic data recipe... Exact setup in the response tweet. Do note that using Jev is definitely more expensive than using Voyage rerank-3 bc of the tokens in the lengthy rubric included in every request (t
0195X posts·Triage & routingOriginal source ↗
PineconePinecone@pinecone𝕏
Use @typesafeai's Jev model with Pinecone to rerank results with natural language criteria! Usually with rerankers, it's hard to cleanly specify what should and shouldn't be returned in results. Jev resolves this by refactoring the problem into evaluating against distinct binary criteria, which pairs great with Pinecone retrieval! In this demo, we compare using Jev and Claude to rerank 200 returned candidates from Pinecone. Jev returns a reranked list in about a second — 830 to 1,300 ms across eight test queries. Claude Opus 5, doing the same job in one long-context call, takes 4.2 to 6.8
0194X posts·Tools & appstime830 to 1,300 ms across eight test queriesOriginal source ↗
JosephJoseph@Joe_Billiot_Law𝕏
First real use case with Jev got up and running last night. Used it with GLiNER 2.5 base to help dramatically speed up entity / relationship extraction. GLiNER by itself for Graph RAG over a huge document corpus is fairly unreliable. Using Jev to help determine what it got right and then send everything else to my local 35B model. ~25x performance boost.
0193X posts·Research & dataOriginal source ↗
Ajay Ponna VenkateshAjay Ponna Venkatesh@ajaypv4𝕏
We just cracked how to make a great Meta ad using Jev ( a classifier model from TypeSafe AI. ) We pulled around 2,000 real ads from 8 beauty brands off Meta’s Ad Library and graded 302 of them with Jev across 9 dimensions: hook, format, funnel stage, CTA, claim risk and boldness. Jev is an AI evaluation tool from TypeSafe AI that lets you run the same structured review across hundreds of inputs. The best ad in the entire set was a drag performer climbing 300 stairs to see if her makeup survives, for e.l.f. Cosmetics. She puts the makeup to the test by climbing the stairs, and that’s the ad.
0191X posts·Content & growthOriginal source ↗