Tests Jev on Chess Moves

Hassan compares Jev with GLM 5.3 in a chess game, which GLM 5.3 won by checkmate in 29 moves.

View on X costJev: <$0.0001 per move; GLM 5.3: ~$0.008 per move; The whole game cost 24 centstimeJev: ~0.3s per move; GLM 5.3: ~5.8s per move

Hassan@nutlope𝕏

Jev vs GLM 5.3 at chess! Results: ◾ GLM 5.3 won by checkmate in 29 moves ◾ Jev: ~0.3s and <$0.0001 per move ◾ GLM 5.3: ~5.8s and ~$0.008 per move ◾ The whole game cost 24 cents My main takeaway is that it's often useful to use each one to their strengths: ◾ Fast, well-defined classification → specialized models like Jev ◾ Classifications that need reasoning or lookahead → LLMs like GLM 5.3 ◾ Real

Sep 18, 2026X postsView on X

Hassan says specialized models like Jev are useful for fast, well-defined classification, while LLMs like GLM 5.3 suit classifications that need reasoning or lookahead.

Also filed under Games & real time

Steer a 3D Box with Goals
The build steers a 3D box with plain-language goals. An LLM plans each instruction, while TypeSafe Jev makes move, turn, and jump decisions in real time.
Benchmarks Jev on Pokémon Red
The project benchmarks Jev, TypeSafe’s fast decision model, against Jev paired with a GPT-6 Sol planner for playing Pokémon Red.
Plain-English Cellular Ecosystem Simulator
LifePot is a cellular automaton-inspired ecosystem that users describe in plain English. Jev turns those inputs into species, feeding relationships, reproduction strategies, and environmental conditions.
Mapping Children's Behavioral Intent in Games
Mores Research used Jev to map children’s behavioral intent in games and examine how it correlates with real-world behavior. It reports mapping intents across 45+ real sessions involving 20 child users over a long horizon.