devwithjev
— reading now— views
Submit a build

Solves Minesweeper with Jev

Buddy Works compared Jev and Opus 5 on a Minesweeper task. Jev took 24s and cost $0.003; Opus 5 took 2:19 and cost $1.09.

View on X cost$0.003time24s
Buddy Works@useBuddy𝕏
Weekend teaser: Jev vs Opus 5 The task? Win Minesweeper. ⚡ Jev: 24s | $0.003 🐢 Opus 5: 2:19 | $1.09 5.8× faster. 363× lower cost. Next week, we'll release a demo so you can compare different models and see how they handle your own board. https://t.co/quQOzli57l
Sep 18, 2026X postsView on X
Buddy Works described the comparison as a weekend teaser. It said a demo would be released the following week so people could compare models on their own boards.

Also filed under Games & real time

  • Steer a 3D Box with Goals

    The build steers a 3D box with plain-language goals. An LLM plans each instruction, while TypeSafe Jev makes move, turn, and jump decisions in real time.

  • Benchmarks Jev on Pokémon Red

    The project benchmarks Jev, TypeSafe’s fast decision model, against Jev paired with a GPT-6 Sol planner for playing Pokémon Red.

  • Plain-English Cellular Ecosystem Simulator

    LifePot is a cellular automaton-inspired ecosystem that users describe in plain English. Jev turns those inputs into species, feeding relationships, reproduction strategies, and environmental conditions.

  • Mapping Children's Behavioral Intent in Games

    Mores Research used Jev to map children’s behavioral intent in games and examine how it correlates with real-world behavior. It reports mapping intents across 45+ real sessions involving 20 child users over a long horizon.