Jev-Powered Game Playing

Adrián Mato used Jev from @typesafeai to switch between manual and AI-driven gameplay. The setup ran at 2–3 calls/sec at 60 FPS, with ~150ms average latency.

View on X cost2–3 calls/sec at 60 FPStime~150ms avg latency

Adrián Mato 🐙@adrianmg𝕏

Had some fun taking Jev from @typesafeai for a spin, switching seamlessly between manual and AI-driven gameplay. It’s clocking 2–3 calls/sec at 60 FPS, with ~150ms avg latency. The most interesting part wasn’t the speed, though. It was distilling the game into the variables, actions, and decision criteria the AI needs to play well: Does it risk going for the powerup, or protect the ball? When is t

Sep 18, 2026X postsView on X

Mato said the main challenge was distilling the game into variables, actions, and decision criteria the AI needs to play well. He gave choosing between pursuing a powerup and protecting the ball as an example.

Also filed under Games & real time

Steer a 3D Box with Goals
The build steers a 3D box with plain-language goals. An LLM plans each instruction, while TypeSafe Jev makes move, turn, and jump decisions in real time.
Benchmarks Jev on Pokémon Red
The project benchmarks Jev, TypeSafe’s fast decision model, against Jev paired with a GPT-6 Sol planner for playing Pokémon Red.
Plain-English Cellular Ecosystem Simulator
LifePot is a cellular automaton-inspired ecosystem that users describe in plain English. Jev turns those inputs into species, feeding relationships, reproduction strategies, and environmental conditions.
Mapping Children's Behavioral Intent in Games
Mores Research used Jev to map children’s behavioral intent in games and examine how it correlates with real-world behavior. It reports mapping intents across 45+ real sessions involving 20 child users over a long horizon.