devwithjev
— reading now— views
Submit a build

Jev Plays Tetris by Selecting Moves

niwacis tested Jev against Claude Haiku 4.5 in Tetris, asking each model to choose among up to 12 placements with identical piece sequences and starting boards. Across 10 matches, Jev reached 20 lines eight times and took about 19 seconds to clear, while Haiku reached 20 lines nine times and took about 80 seconds.

View on X time1手の思考時間 : Jev 0.25秒 / Haiku 約1秒
niwacis@J_niwacis𝕏
JevとClaude Haiku 4.5でテトリスを対戦させて、 どちらが先に20ラインを消せるか競わせてみました。 ・ブロックの出現順と初期盤面は完全一致 ・最大12個の配置候補からどれを選ぶかだけを聞く ・回答が返った瞬間にブロックを落とす(=落ちるまでの間が思考時間) 左のJevはほぼノンストップで落とし続け、右のHaikuは一手ごとに約1秒止まります。 この差は、Haiku(LLM)は答えを文章として生成しますが、Jevは文章を作らず、選択肢ごとの確率を返すことに特化したモデルだからです。 動画は1対戦のサンプルですが、10回対戦して集計を取りました。 ・20ライン到達 : Jev 8回 / Haiku 9回(AIでもミスるのねw) ・クリア所要時間 : Jev 約19秒 / Haiku 約80秒(約4倍高速) ・1手の思考時間 : Jev 0.25秒 / Haiku 約1秒 ・1
Sep 18, 2026X postsView on X
Jev returns probabilities for the available choices rather than generating a text response. The test dropped each block as soon as the model responded, so the interval before it fell represented thinking time.

Also filed under Games & real time

  • Steer a 3D Box with Goals

    The build steers a 3D box with plain-language goals. An LLM plans each instruction, while TypeSafe Jev makes move, turn, and jump decisions in real time.

  • Benchmarks Jev on Pokémon Red

    The project benchmarks Jev, TypeSafe’s fast decision model, against Jev paired with a GPT-6 Sol planner for playing Pokémon Red.

  • Plain-English Cellular Ecosystem Simulator

    LifePot is a cellular automaton-inspired ecosystem that users describe in plain English. Jev turns those inputs into species, feeding relationships, reproduction strategies, and environmental conditions.

  • Mapping Children's Behavioral Intent in Games

    Mores Research used Jev to map children’s behavioral intent in games and examine how it correlates with real-world behavior. It reports mapping intents across 45+ real sessions involving 20 child users over a long horizon.