devwithjev
— reading now— views
Submit a build

Tools & apps

783 builds · page 19 of 20

Reindent@ReindentAI𝕏
We got access! And in this video we explore @typesafeai's Jev, our first hands-on, then build Excuse Court with Codex: structured questions in, probability estimates out. Cat trouble or alien abduction: what would you test with it? https://t.co/32iOhoIXFC
1953X posts·Tools & appsOriginal source ↗
rowansail@rowansail𝕏
I made a tool that allows customers to create their own filters 👀 with JEV this is the first time it actually feels instant > type "for the winter" and it classifies every product on the fly, based on the product information with EasyFinder we've been chasing intent-based search for 18 months, so this is actually really cool! still an experiment, but having a few other ideas on JEV for i will shar
1951X posts·Tools & appsOriginal source ↗
Kaushik@0xkaushik_k𝕏
Got early access to @typesafeai Jev and spent a few hours building on it. The problem I keep hitting: agent traces tell you which tool ran, how long it took, what it returned but never whether the agent is actually getting anywhere. An agent editing, testing and reverting the same file six times looks perfectly healthy in the logs. So I made JevScope. It watches an AI agent work and asks Jev what
1947X posts·Tools & appsOriginal source ↗
alaska@145k4𝕏
i was curious if @typesafeai 's jev would make different judgements if you push a problem through a Choice vs. a Noul, so i ran it through a short series of trolley problems the only time they disagreed on judgement? deciding whether or not its worth killing more people to score higher on a benchmark 😬
1944X posts·Tools & appsOriginal source ↗
Nagajyothi@njpCoder𝕏
built a chrome extension that lets me write my own X algorithm. it hides engagement bait, empty hooks and ads before I see them. the rules are plain English. Jev by @typesafeai checks every post in half a second. anyone want to try it? https://t.co/ybO4pSm1pK
1933X posts·Tools & appstimein half a secondOriginal source ↗
Jerlin@eviljer𝕏
Jev 场景探索:基于高质量数据集做个性化推荐。 孩子或家长输入任意的自然语言,基于整个数据集来给出推荐结果。 初试下来,命中的结果高度贴合预期,平均耗费时间较长,需要 15 秒左右,故展示效果的等待时长经过删减。 https://t.co/gNLi5Qs9Mo
1930X posts·Tools & appstime15 秒左右Original source ↗
Priyansh Jain@priyansh0327𝕏
Just trying out Jev, I made a FlightWifi Chrome extension that: - Checks Wi-Fi on your flight (automatically) - Detects if the aircraft supports video calls, email, or nothing at all - Detects Starlink or traditional Wi-Fi and shows the verdict directly on Google Flights and more - So you know if you can actually work before booking ✈️ No more guessing if the Wi-Fi is worth paying for https://t.co
1929X posts·Tools & appsOriginal source ↗
Valentin Sattinger@v_sattinger𝕏
My god.. so many nice use cases for the new Jev model. I quickly built a PII and sensitive data redactor. First checks each sentence if it needs redaction, then feeds the affected sentences individually to pick the words that should get redacted. Compared to e.g. using regex this catches also information that is not following a known structure but should still be redacted (like a business secret o
1926X posts·Tools & appsOriginal source ↗
GrumpyBalkanSoftwareEngineer@TheBalkanHacker𝕏
Yes yes, Jev can drive, Jev can be a programming language... but lets just skip the middle man ... Jev be the "computer" !!! Motorola 6502 emulation directly on Jev 🤣😅 @typesafeai @dotpem Took a bit "hill-climbing to figure out how to instruct and the data shape, but now it runs whole (very) short programs. As you can see it still gets it wrong against the programmatic emulator reference every onc
1919X posts·Tools & appsOriginal source ↗
Benjamin André-Micolon@bendersej𝕏
Concrete real world use case with JEV from @typesafeai Filling PDF forms: ~1.5s to fill, ~500ms to classify - insane numbers Especially useful when the input data is dirty (bad fields, wrong fields), with a human in the loop to review and fix https://t.co/kDUure64IG
1917X posts·Tools & appstime~1.5s to fill; ~500ms to classifyOriginal source ↗
いにしえ@高信頼AIニュース"NeuralWire.org"運営|Will Oldgram@old_pgmrs_will𝕏
Jev + Grok + 青空文庫のデータを使って、新たな青空文庫風の小説を無限に生成するアプリを作ってみた 青空文庫のテキスト断片をランダムに抽出して Jev が続きの文章として使えるかどうかを判定、OK なものを Grok がアレンジして繋げていく形 https://t.co/Dqo1YE2a5M
1916X posts·Tools & appsOriginal source ↗
Probably Nick@nickfromlater𝕏
Jev playing the piano. I gave it the key, all 88 notes to choose from and the sequence so far. Did chords in a second pass once we had the melody by giving it the bar's notes & 7 chords to choose from. Plays it safe & loves alternating between G and A but with some lessons, it might get there.
1914X posts·Tools & appsOriginal source ↗
Dan Willoughby@DanRWilloughby𝕏
I built a linter for AI writing tells, and the judge is a model that can't write a sentence. Sniff Test reads a draft one paragraph at a time and asks Jev ten yes-or-no questions. Is the claim hedged three times. Does the closer just restate the paragraph. Is there a not-X-but-Y turn. Is there a cost figure with no price next to it. It comes back with one probability per rule in about a fifth of a
1913X posts·Tools & appsOriginal source ↗
Nick DeJesus 🛒🎉 - Former Unpaid CTO @BTPipeline@Dayhaysoos𝕏
I wanted an easier way to test my jev requests and see if my results are improving, so I built jevals! It's a local workbench for testng the Noul, Choice, and Score primitives. You can mix requests as well. You can run a seed command to see and play with some of the examples in the @typesafeai Made a quick demo video if you're interested in testing jev in a million different ways lol
1910X posts·Tools & appsOriginal source ↗
harish@hari65535𝕏
I wanted a feed I could describe in plain English, so I hacked one together. Two prompts control my YouTube and X feeds as I scroll. Jev responds in 70–500ms. Estimate: $0.50–$1/month for 8h/day. A fast, cheap decision primitive alongside LLMs. https://t.co/oD3koQ4Nab
1909X posts·Tools & appstime70–500msOriginal source ↗
Dan Willoughby@DanRWilloughby𝕏
one more for the pile, from the writing side: Sniff Test, a prose linter where Jev is the judge. ten yes/no questions per paragraph, 182 ms median, and on 54 clean paragraphs it raised 1 false flag where Haiku raised 37. runs as a commit hook or a Claude Code skill. https://t.co/fkN2VDyoSJ
1901X posts·Tools & appstime182 ms medianOriginal source ↗
Tim Krase@crossiBuilds𝕏
Here's what happens if you let Jev draw for multiple iterations. Every pixel gets the color of the neighbors from the last run and a scaled down map of the whole image as the context. Worked not that bad until the 6th or 7th generation when it started to destroy the sun again 😂 https://t.co/RhM5y7laNn
1893X posts·Tools & appsOriginal source ↗
Sagar Tamang@sagar_builds𝕏
Inspired by @typesafeai's Jev, I built sarvam-jev - an open engine that reads typed decisions straight out of an Indic model's logits instead of generating JSON token by token. Same sarvam-1 weights, 8.8× faster than making it write the same answers — and the output can't be malformed, because nothing is generated. Runs entirely in your browser. No backend, no waitlist: https://t.co/jLnMT8EeDq Hin
1890X posts·Tools & appstime8.8× fasterOriginal source ↗
Seth Thompson@s3ththompson𝕏
Jev lets me search my physical library by looking at the entire book index in parallel in 300ms. Here, the answer to “Who invented photography?” is probably on page 98 under "Niépce, Joseph Nicéphore" https://t.co/15HwgDZ67D
1888X posts·Tools & appstime300msOriginal source ↗
Bilal Harouchi@bilal_harouchi𝕏
Put Jev in my TV app (stealth for now). Netflix has 2,000 engineers and still can't do "something light, no gore, we're tired." The trick isn't the model. It's refusing to let it generate anything. It ranks what I already have. Pick a mood on the remote → it re-ranks 797 movies & shows in one pass. Cards glide to their new rank. 104,557 tokens · $0.0044 per press · ~1s server-side, 1.5s on a cheap
1885X posts·Tools & appscost$0.0044 per presstime~1s server-side, 1.5s on a cheapOriginal source ↗
NULL=RUN@GOROman𝕏
今読んでる文章の段落に応じて、Jevで動的にBGMを自動生成するのを作ってみた。コード進行をいい感じにする。 https://t.co/tr3xR9PzXe
1880X posts·Tools & appsOriginal source ↗
Dan Willoughby@DanRWilloughby𝕏
I built a linter for AI writing tells, and the judge is a model that can't write a sentence. Sniff Test reads a draft one paragraph at a time and asks Jev ten yes-or-no questions. Is the claim hedged three times. Does the closer just restate the paragraph. Is there a not-X-but-Y turn. Is there a cost figure with no price next to it. It comes back with one probability per rule in about a fifth of a
1874X posts·Tools & appstimeabout a fifth of aOriginal source ↗
Divyanshu@Divyanshueth𝕏
been playing with Jev from @typesafeai and built unsaidbrief the idea: we give AI builders vague prompts, then spend hours fixing decisions we never actually made paste your brief and it uses Jev to flag missing decisions and possible conflicts, with probabilities you can see answer what matters, recheck, then take the clearer brief into your builder small walkthrough below. curious what it catche
1873X posts·Tools & appsOriginal source ↗
Albiona Hoti@albicodes𝕏
went deeper down the Jev rabbit hole 🌻 196 artworks from The Met mapped between quiet ↔ loud and sacred ↔ domestic change the words and watch the collection rearrange https://t.co/deUdeapWKu
1866X posts·Tools & appsOriginal source ↗
JUUN@junhoh0ng𝕏
Can Jev escape a maze? Turns out it depends how you write the map. When given as a 2D grid, “wall above?” is worse than chance. “Wall to the right?” is 99.9%. Rotate the page and every side becomes 1.00. It isn’t seeing the grid. It’s reading the next character. So I gave @typesafeai’s Jev the maze as lines of sight and named places, not as a map. Notes below.
1864X posts·Tools & appsOriginal source ↗
あるごす@argos_M1111𝕏
ローカルJevできた。確信度ないけどw 40msで返事返ってくると不安になるけど一応GPUはピクっと動いているのでLLMの出力にはなっている https://t.co/8eEtZ0CpSU
1862X posts·Tools & appstime40msOriginal source ↗
hityyhz@hityyhz𝕏
Also been playing with @typesafeai Jev. Insane. A pile of apps suddenly become possible. What a time to be a builder. Sharing experiments here. First one: Keystroke oracle / predictive launcher A normal launcher ranks by aliases, fuzzy match, and habit. Jev reads intent. Type “the pdf I just downloaded” and the newest PDF is already the top hit. Full confidence on every keystroke. About 100 ms.
1850X posts·Tools & appstimeAbout 100 msOriginal source ↗
Alex Carrabre@carrabre𝕏
Jev added more precise camera controls and ~230x faster planning to an editing tool I built on top of @mintdotgg! Jev converts natural language to precise camera movements (ie spelling ASTRA) by answering a few calibrated multiple-choice questions (move kind, plus direction and magnitude band per camera axis) By creating keyframes it emits a structured trajectory (time/azimuth/elevation/distance)
1841X posts·Tools & appstime~230x faster planningOriginal source ↗
Sasha@sashatwitts𝕏
made some time to test jev from @typesafeai used theMealDB and sent each recipe to Jev to score on five dimensions: quick, cheap, healthy, impressive, and beginner-friendly, while filtering out desserts, sauces, bread, etc. The whole run took just over a minute and cost $0.0455. I ran it twice and got slightly different rankings. Close results swapped places over the runs. So you either need to us
1835X posts·Tools & appscost$0.0455timejust over a minuteOriginal source ↗