devwithjev
reading now views
Submit a build

Jev-Powered Browser Agent Benchmark

The benchmark uses Jev to compare two browser agents with different models on task completion efficiency, scoring correctness, time, actions, and cost.

Danny PrevoznikDanny Prevoznik@DanielPrevoznik𝕏
judge jev is the law. score two browser agents w/ different models on task completion, using jev to judge which was more efficient at the job. scored on correctness, time, actions, and cost. https://t.co/8M7JBou6O1
Sep 18, 2026X postsView on X

Also filed under Agents & browsers

  • Jev-kit for Claude Code

    Cadaverr’s Jev-kit integrates TypeSafe’s Jev model into Claude Code for tasks including tool-call guarding, sub-agent sizing, file search, and browser automation. Jev answers pick-one and yes/no questions in about 0.3s, according to the author.

  • Jev Browser Automation

    jev-browser takes a task and URL, then uses Jev to choose one action per step from the page’s clickable, typeable, and selectable elements. It scores whether the goal is met or the run is stuck.

  • Jev Gates Agent Memory Saves

    The author used Jev to check whether proposed agent memories were supported by the original conversation and guide whether to save, skip, or defer them. On 100 synthetic cases at a .40 cutoff, Jev kept 39 of 50 memories labeled worth keeping and saved no candidates labeled skip or defer; its median gate latency was 250 ms.

  • Jev in the Knocklabs Agent Harness

    Chris Bell says he implemented this in the Knocklabs agent harness using Jev, based on common types of requests seen in live traces.